The Cosmos is composed of a material fluid. This material and its
motions, behaviors, and interactions provide the backdrop for
eveerything  that exists! Everything in it from the smallest particles to
large superclusters of galaxies(and possibly beyond) are motions and
interactions within this fluid. For example a galaxy should be seen as
nothing more than a very large eddy current and the solar and planetary
systems within it are only smaller areas of turbulence within the galaxy
itself.  Space itself is more likely to be infinite than finite and the big bang
if it(and the expansion going on within this patch) did occur is only a tiny
insignifigant patch in a much larger and probably infinitely large cosmos
with an infinitely  large variety of motions and interactions occurring. The
key to formation of a galaxy and an eddy current of any size is
CIRCULAR MOTION in SPACE.
 

   The beauty in describing the cosmos as a dynamic fluid is most everyone knows what a
fluid is. It is something tangible that can be grasped. It resonantes strongly with
the way nature works. In nature there are already currents in many forms right here
on earth. There are currents in the air--the jetstream the tradewinds, currents in
bodies of water especially the great ocean currents. There is a video called "OCEAN
DRIFTERS" produced by NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC about 10-15 years ago. It is still
available on home video and last I checked www.amazon.com still stocked it. It is
probably also available for rent in some video stores. Anyway this video can be of
great benefit to those who are humble enough to look through and notice the deeper
meanings of this video. In it the narrartor Keith David talks about the great ocean
currents and all of the lifeforms and various phenomena of the DEEP SEA. In one
statement he makes notes of the fact that these oceans currents are what
essentially shape everything within the deep sea. Does not gravity does the same
thing on the large cosmic scale, it shapes matter into planets, solar sytems, and
galaxies. In other statements he makes reference to the gelatinous drifters that
serenely drift through the ocean currents as nothing more than organized sea water.
Would not this be essentially the best way to view matter on the small scale of
subatic particles, atoms, and molecules as the substance or material of space
organized into quantitized shells of matter or specific patterns. Anyway I strongly
suggest to any person who is interested in these things and wanting to take a
fresh, natural, purely human approach to watch this video, try to find the deeper
wider meaning and THINK about what it all means.

  Also instead of all those parallel or hidden dimensions there is only
ONE COSMOS with an infinitely possible range of energy levels
determined frequency and wavelength. There maybe things composed
of energy that an average human cannot perceive because they are
outside of the visible frequency spectrum or that of any available
measuring apparatuses but they are still part of the same cosmos of
infinite space, and an infinte number of possible energy levels
determined by frequency and wavelength.
 

Space is a fluid. Its motion guided by matter and the motion of matter
guided by the currents of this fluid. This would describe the force of
gravity very well. A particle with positive gravity would have a spin
rotating inward pulling in fluid and an a particle with negative gravity
would have a spin pushing out fluid.  The faster the rate of motion or
rotation(frequency) would determine the gravity and therefore the mass
of the particle. So all elementary particles of matter would essentially be
FLUID in MOTION around a CLOSED CIRCULAR PATH. All forms of
matter could also be seen essentially as specific PATTERNS of
MOTION in the great SEA of FLUID that constitutes the PHYSICAL
UNIVERSE.  This fluid is what may be feeding energy into matter and
this energy is then ejected outwards AS other forces such as
electromagnetism.  Also because gravity increases when a given mass
becomes more dense the inward pulling force of the particles I have just
described will become more coherent or aligned as particles of matter
come closer together producing a stronger force.  The force of gravity
(as modeled in this view) being generated from currents of fluid in space
could be compared to currents in a stream or river. In a river or stream
the strength of the current is dependent on how fast the current is
moving. The faster  it is going the stronger the force. The same has
already been noted with gravity as when planets orbiting closer to the
sun do so faster than planets farther away from the sun AS WELL the
fact that objects in a gravitational field less than than that of the
earth(such as the moon) fall at a slower rate than that of objects falling
on earth.  This leads one to deduce that there is a positive relationship
between gravity and speed and therefore a faster and stronger current is
being produced by a more massive object than by a less massive object.
 

    Additional ideas added May 27,2002.

  Gravity is an attractive force so any particle of matter creating gravity via a
"motion effect" must be creating some type of inward pulling motion. The
question is what is it pulling on or better said what is it drawing in on? As I
have said before I suspect it is a current. A current of what though? Is it this
either that you mention. I do not see any value left in this term and choose to
use the word fluid which is simply something that flows. Is this fluid made of
individual units or "stuff" as some say? In regards to particles and quasiparticles
I POSE this argument. If particles that have a gravitational effect do so through
the effect of motion then it should also be possible that there exist particles
that do not exhibit any gravitational phenomena. These zero-gravity particles
*wood* still be *material* in nature but they would not have any gravitiational
effect because they produce no motion that would pull in these currents. I also
want to quickly point out that those particles that do engage in gravitational
interactions wood be coupled to these currents because they are feeding of
them as well and would therefore flow along these current lines.  Another quick
point to make is that in the family or class of particles that do have gravity
there may be variations in the amount of gravitational effect produced by a
certain type or variety of particle as compared to another type of gravitating
particle that is independent of it's mass because it's *rate of motion* or
rotational frequency maybe different. Particles with faster more rapid motion
would produce more rapid and therefore stronger gravitational currents. Also
there is some mention that an exotic form of matter may exist that possesses
negative gravity or a repulsive force as *opposed* to an attractive force.  My
view is that a negative gravity particle would be a particle that had a motion
that instead of pulling or drawing a current in would be have an outward
motion pushing or ejecting a flux of particles(of the fluid in space) away from it
and pushing on others particles in this material fluid producing a repulsive
force. This would essentially be the same mechanism used in space
propulsion vehicles that eject a portion of it's substance to accelerate it forward
or alter it's motion. One last comment on the principles involved in gravity is
you may want to consider the following jargon: displacement, buoyancy, and
pressure in the surrounding medium of subquantum particles--if I have any
other ideas about this I will post them later.

  Anyway, It seems as if then the either that some speak of or as I call it a *fluid
material* may very well indeed be composed of material particles but
non-gravitational particles.  The next question one may want to * pose* is this.
Is the fluid material of the cosmos that is the physicaL BASIS or SOURCE of
this particle flux that produces gravity (via an inward motion) as wellas
probably other interactions a medium of all uniform particles or is it is *a wide
spectrum" of particles with a variable density throughout space? If the cosmos
is essentially a vast sea or ocean of particles and aggregates of matter of
different sizes with different properties all engaged in a vast interaction of
random and chaotic particle fluxes then the evolutionary diversity and patterns
of the cosmos would be comparable with the evolutionary diversity and
patterns of other phenomena such as biological life.  In other words the
cosmos would be a vast spectrum of energetic particles engaging in an
endless cascade of energetic events resulting in an ever-changing cosmic
landscape.
 
 
 

            The following article was written by Charles Vind

            Return to my Website at:http://www.west.net/~simon/index.html